Skip to main content
Back to case studies

QualitySemiconductor

Defect Classification Evaluation Framework

A production-aligned evaluation framework that scored defect classifiers by operational risk instead of only standard ML metrics.

Semiconductor wafer inspection scene representing defect classification and quality evaluation.

Problem

Create a production-aligned evaluation protocol for defect classifiers that accounts for class imbalance, annotation uncertainty, and downstream impact.

  • +Operational misalignment: Traditional ML metrics do not reflect the real cost of misclassified defects.
  • +High-stakes errors: Misclassifications can trigger unnecessary tool interventions or allow critical excursions to pass.

Approach

  • +Custom scoring function: Incorporates defect severity and classification confidence.
  • +Comparative Analysis: Benchmarks models based on operational impact (yield loss risk) vs just technical metrics.
  • +Expert Disagreement: Includes weighting for ambiguous ground truth labels.

Delivered

  • +Performance evaluation framework.
  • +Custom cost-weighted scoring function.
  • +Validation protocol applied to SEM image classification.

Result

  • +Improved model selection: Selected models with better production reliability than standard accuracy metrics.
  • +Risk-aligned analysis: Revealed cost variance between models with similar F1 scores.

Where it ran

  • +Model evaluation for fab deployment.
  • +Tool and recipe validation.
  • +Long-term drift monitoring of classifier behavior.

Stack

Computer Vision · Cost-Sensitive Learning · Model Evaluation · Operational Risk

Related solutions

Photo: A female worker in protective clothing inspects silicon wafers in a semiconductor factory, by metamorworks, Adobe Stock 1536030058

Next step

Have a similar operational constraint?

Bring the baseline, the target, and the data you have. We'll define the first measurable pilot.

60 minutes. Free. No deck, no pitch.